Property operations
Build the Org Chart Your Cash Flow Goal Actually Requires
The engine for $10,000 a month is not the engine for $42,000 a month. How I map roles, run a salary cap, and staff a portfolio market by market.
When you're starting and your goal is $10,000 a month, you need to build the business that produces $10,000 a month. That's it. That's the business.
If you're trying to create $100,000 a month, that is a completely different business with a completely different org chart.
This is the part almost nobody maps out, and it's the reason I see people either stall at a handful of units or blow themselves up trying to build an enterprise their cash flow can't support. Cody walked the room through the math of a deal. This is the other half: the engine you put behind the math, how you staff it, and how you pay for it.
Related reading: Why Renovating Out of Cash Flow Traps You in a 3-Year Project
I've built this exact map for every company I've run: Multifamily Strategy, the first property management company I sold, the second one I own now, a sales and marketing company I traded my way out of, and every real estate portfolio I hold. The 144-unit we're about to close has its own org chart with its own on-site staff. Robin Hood Village Resort, has five staff in winter and up to ten in summer.
Here's how to build yours.
Start With the Number, Then Ask What Roles Exist
Set your goal first. Then map what roles and people you actually need in the universe to create that business.
At $10,000 a month, the answer is: you, mostly. That's very simple to do yourself. But understand that a single-person org is really hard if what you actually want is time freedom, and most people in this business want time freedom eventually. Financial freedom, vacations, retiring a spouse, making work optional, or just controlling your own calendar.
The correct scale of your business is entirely dependent on you.
One of my personal reasons for scaling up was an obligation on Robin Hood I had to solve. A million dollars, two years. The engine I had to build stopped looking like "get to 50 to 100 rentals, get to $10,000 a month cash flow" and became "wait, I need to be making about $42,000 a month, and I'm not." Different goal, different engine.
And scaling up isn't automatically correct. Matt Hawkins (Lumberjack Landlord on YouTube, one of my favorite mentors) decided early: no people, no partners, this is what I'm going to do. You can absolutely build that business. It has certain limits. It can only make so much, and for many people that's way more than they need. Matt is worth more than me, Cody, and probably most of the people in that room combined.
The Four Functions of a Real Estate Business
At the top of the org chart, almost every time, is you. Put your actual objective in the corner of the page (say $10,000 a month) and then break the work into categories.
Deal finding. For me this splits two ways. Direct to owner, building relationships in markets: that one I do myself, because no matter how I scale, it will always be highly dependent on me. And broker relationships: the people professionally out there finding and negotiating deals, where the question is how do I move to the top of their list and work exclusively with them.
Management. Third party or you. I opted to do some of this myself because my first property manager absolutely robbed me, and it's happened more than once since. I like the control. But understand it's a crappy business to be in: it's low margin, and if you do a great job for your clients you increase the value of their property, they sell it, and you get fired. Do a terrible job and you definitely get fired. Do a mediocre job and, well, who wants a mediocre business? I run about 50/50 between my rentals and third-party clients, which lets me be excellent for everyone without depending on clients to make the business work.
Related reading: The Hybrid Management Model: Self-Manage Rentals for $20 a Showing
Capital. You do this after you find a deal. A lot of these relationships are the owners you've already met with: people who own in that market, have already made money in real estate, and are comfortable there. Very, very common for my capital partners to already own buildings in the markets I operate in.
Maintenance and construction. Capital improvements, unit turns, and having an actual plan. Without it the building falls apart and you lose all your money.
Under management specifically you also have rent collection and tenant communications: someone has to answer the phone and coordinate contractors.
How Little Time This Actually Takes at $10,000 a Month
Here's what surprises people. At the $10,000 level, none of these roles are big jobs.
Deal finding, direct to owner: I'm making one or two calls a day on average, so about ten calls a week. Two or three people actually pick up. At least one of them will book a coffee meeting. So on average, once a week I'm sitting down with an owner in a market where I want to buy. Out of state, I book a phone call instead. I'm never having the full conversation on a cold call: they're not ready for it. I'm calling to schedule a call, a coffee, or in Texas a barbecue.
Total: 30 minutes a day maximum. Usually about ten minutes for me.
Brokers are even easier. Talking to brokers is like ordering a drink at Starbucks: they are literally there waiting for someone to call about the deal. Your only mission on the call is to come off as a ready, willing and able buyer.
The way I find them: hop on LoopNet or Crexi and look at who lists the properties that look like what I want to buy. I'm shopping the image, not the numbers. That would be cool, that would be cool, that looks horrible, that one is 380 Class A units and I'm going to assume I don't qualify for it yet. Whoever is listing the buildings I want is the broker I want a relationship with, because that won't be their only deal. Brokers market themselves, which makes this the cheapest lead source in the business. Thirty minutes.
Remember what the online price actually tells you, which is nothing. When you see a building listed, you know what it looks like, you know what they claim the numbers are if they shared any, and you know there's a seller willing to sell. That's all.
Capital raising runs on the same order we always use: deal, debt, equity. You find or manufacture the deal, then you choose the most appropriate debt product: I think of it like a dropdown menu, where you click and see what's available for this deal. Seller finance, private capital, an equity partner, bank debt, direct to Fannie, bridge loans, on and on. Then, with a full package assembled, you go to someone for the last 10% or 20% of the deal. Capital is not complicated. It's just almost impossible without a deal in hand.
Time commitment for a capital raise: a few days per deal, and it doesn't come up often. Across three or four deals a year, maybe a week out of your year.
Management at that scale is a very part-time job with a little work every week. Once you pass 30 units, put it in professional management. Offloading it lowers your margin and costs you some experience (you may have to buy one or two more deals to offset the cost) but that's a fair trade.
Related reading: Why I Started My Own Property Management Company Across 600 Units
That's the whole engine for $10,000 a month. A few 12-plexes that went well, maybe a 25-unit building. You can do it in under 100 units. Two, three, four deals a year, and you're there in two to three years.
The Bugatti Engine in a Camry
Where people go wrong is building for a business they don't have.
I've watched it happen. They lease an expensive office, hire five staff, put dialers on the phone. The first mentor Cody and I ever had was the perfect mentor on how not to buy real estate: genuinely the worst investor I've ever met. He had a vision and he matched the vision instead of the number. There was no number at the top of his page at all. He just said: we need ten dialers calling for deals, I'll hire a bunch of brokers with limited experience and train them myself, they'll handle all these deals.
The business didn't work at all. He put the engine you'd put in a Bugatti into a Camry-sized business and it blew the car apart. There's a reason they build them the way they build them.
Build the business that makes sense for your number.
The Rules of the Org Chart
When you do start filling in roles, there are only two rules:
- Every position needs a name on it.
- No position can have two names.
Any one person can be slotted into as many roles as they can handle. You just can't have two people owning the same role, because then nothing flows in the right direction.
And here's why it matters as you scale: what gets time-consuming and eventually impossible is when the name in every box is you. You, you, you, you. You can't build a big business that way. If your target is $10,000 a month, fine: do it. Matt Hawkins is probably at $25,000 to $30,000 a month, he's busy, and even he has hired underneath him. He has himself, his wife, and a private property manager who works only for their family. His org chart has started to expand, and he has a boatload of cash flow.
What My Chart Actually Looks Like
Take Stephenville, Texas. I have 186 units there: a few smaller properties, a 44-unit and a 76-unit. The smaller ones need no dedicated staff. The 76-unit needs one on-site. A property like the 144-unit needs two.
For that much real estate in one market I need maintenance, I need acquisitions and capital to keep expanding, and I need on-site leasing at each property, because at that scale there are too many residents calling with too many projects for me to pick up the phone all day. At the 76-unit we did six evictions right off the bat, and every one of those needs a unit turn.
So here's how the seats got filled.
Property management: Corey. She oversees multiple regions and takes up $50,000 of salary cap plus a small equity stake in my PM company. She's underpaid in cash and given a piece of a rapidly growing company, which is a good deal for her.
Stephenville on-site: Hannah. She's at $45,000, works part-time on the 44-unit and part-time on the 76-unit, and reports to Corey. Hannah ran a property management company in Stephenville that does fantastically in single family. She's lived there her whole life and is connected with every nonprofit in town. We always have problems with the fire marshal, who only likes working with people from Stephenville: small town, he wants to work with his buddies. The assistant fire marshal is married to Hannah. Putting Hannah on the team makes a lot of sense.
Acquisitions: Caleb Hommel. I love negotiating deals, but someone on the team is better at the front end of it. Caleb was one of my first mentees and has a little over 200 rentals today. He owns the broker relationships and the owner relationships, plus legal and lending on the front end. He'll present me five or six deals he's underwritten: here are the relationships, here are the opportunities, I want to pursue one of these two. I pick one and we start the capital raise and go under contract. He talks to the lenders, negotiates with them, and presents loan packages to me; I file the paperwork and get us to the finish line.
That handoff is the whole point. When I'm at a property literally putting out a fire (we had a garage burn at the 76-unit) Caleb is in the office making sure every deal is progressing. When I'm coaching Multifamily Strategy, he's at the broker lunches.
Caleb's compensation is a whopping zero dollars. We share every deal we do together 50/50. He's a straight-up partner, which means he gets equity and costs me none of my salary cap.
One thing we know about Caleb from years of working together: he's one of the most effective people alive as long as he has one primary task. Give him two and he tries to do both at 100%, which does not work. So we keep him charging at one thing: outreach and connections, all front end. His job is basically taking people to lunch all day, which is the most costly thing in the world for me time-wise and the best possible use of him.
Maintenance: outsourced, zone defense. I don't want to bring it in house: too many companies already, and I have great contractors. About $50,000 of remaining salary cap goes to three different groups for project coordination (renovation budgets are separate). We use a group called N2 in Stephenville, a couple of other strong contractors, and a solo handyman named Daniel Seals. Instead of on-site maintenance at every property, multiple teams know all my properties and rove between them. Something quick, Daniel drives out. Something big, N2 drives out. They man Stephenville rather than a single building.
Overseeing maintenance: Danny, my wife, who I already retired from teaching. She's amazing at renovation, design and coordinating contractors, and she's meaner than I am, which means contractors actually finish on time. She comes in as an equity holder in the portfolio and the PM company alongside me. Her goal is to retire from this job too (we have kid number one, Andre, who just turned one, and we'd like to keep growing the family) so we know we need to open salary cap for someone to take it over.
Investor relations: me. More on that below.
The difference between $10,000 a month and $42,000 a month is right there. You can solo the first one. The second one requires Corey, Hannah, Caleb, Danny, the contractor network, and software to track all of it.
Run It Like a Salary Cap
Once you know the roles, do the math on payroll. How much does this team cost, and what do I have in expendable income from the profit of this engine?
From the 186 units in Stephenville, I had about $145,000 of salary cap to fill those roles. That's your entire map: here's my market, here's what I have to spend on the best players I can recruit.
I think about it like a baseball team. You have a cap. If someone is really good, you can pay the luxury tax: give a little extra equity, or accept slightly lower profitability to bring on an A-plus. If you find an Ohtani, pay for him. I'll probably give Hannah a substantial raise at some point, because she's close to invaluable for Stephenville, and I'll sacrifice some profitability to keep an A team.
You're also trying to get the right people on the bus and then the right people in the right seats. Sometimes you hire the right person and they're failing in a role; you move them and they thrive. Sometimes you keep moving them and it's still not a fit, and you kindly excuse them from the bus.
Cody and I had a partner in Moses Lake, and we were driving in to meet a broker who, unfortunately, was not very talented. We started to warn him (just so you know, this guy's kind of our C team) and he immediately said, "I don't know if we need to do this meeting then. I played select soccer. I only play A."
That sounds a little mean. It's also true. You cannot have an A team made of C players.
Where the Salary Cap Comes From
This is the mechanic that makes the whole thing fund itself, and it's specific to owning the property management company.
When I do a deal, I negotiate the management contract into the investment opportunity. On the 144-unit, it's 3% plus salaries, with $120,000 a year of salaries for up to three employees. When we acquire the 81-unit next door, that adds $50,000 to the salary cap for its on-site person, built into the actual investment.
My profit on that is nominal. The 3%, less all my variable costs of running PM in that market, is my margin: I'm making about a point on management on a lot of my deals, because the 3% also covers fixed overhead and software. The on-site employees are a direct pass-through from the LLC. Overall I run at roughly a 1% margin on gross rents across everything we manage.
Running skinny is what lets me provide the full service: on-site staffing, rent collection, asset management, owner distributions, accounting and bookkeeping, all rolled into 3% plus on-site salary. As a bonus for an owner, if you were going to run your building with on-site management anyway, you don't have to worry about payroll, taxes or filing W2s. It passes straight through to us. On a smaller building like a 25-unit, it's typically a flat 6% management fee depending on the market.
This is also why opening a new market requires at least one building large enough to carry on-site managers: that's how I open up salary cap. I need a network of buildings paying 6 to 8% to fund the overhead. Then key personnel are paid for by the buildings they specifically serve, with the advantage that a prospective tenant can walk into an office and sign a lease.
Zoom the chart out a level and you get Abilene, Stephenville, Waco and Washington, with Corey sitting above all of them, her salary funded by a portion of each market's nominal 3%.
Speaking of Abilene: I close on 144 units there next week, and in February we close on the 81 next door, which puts us at 225 units in that market. It looks like another 80-unit after that, making it a 300-unit market. Which means building the same engine again, bigger. I cannot have Abilene and Stephenville and Waco and Washington and Robin Hood and have every box say "you, you, you, you." I've watched a lot of people try. That's where friends of mine have gotten stuck with goals that are enormous and org charts that are one name deep.
Investor Relations Is a Role, Not an Afterthought
The worst thing you can do in your portfolio, period, is make everyone a bunch of money and never tell them you're making it along the way.
Because real estate transactions don't go exactly to plan. You're sitting in mine that went least to plan. If we hadn't communicated with partners the whole way through Robin Hood, imagine that call at the end: "Hey guys, surprise, it's been a couple of years, and we didn't make as much money as we thought." That's how you get sued.
My job in IR is asking two questions constantly. Does everyone know what's happening? And when there's a problem, am I allowing my partners to weigh in?
Matt and I have a project in Ephrata where the renovation is going fantastically and the building is beautiful, leasing is fine, but we have a dispute with how our PM is running it and the project is a bit behind schedule. It's not going poorly: it's leasing, it's making money. But if I announced that to Matt cold in front of a room, that's a shock. Instead we get together with our other partner and talk about the deal and about ideas to fix it. We build an org chart for the problem itself. One of our investors said he'd reach out to the chambers of commerce and own the retail leasing. Now he's part of the solution.
I have yet to see almost anyone get sued on a deal where everyone was brought in as part of the solution. It's when you try to fix it all yourself that you get the problems.
Caleb's first deal is the cautionary version. Great deal: a nine out of ten, fantastic debt. But he raised exactly enough to close with a renovation project pending, so when someone moved out he no longer had the cash flow to keep the renovation going. Instead of calling everyone, he just kept writing checks and funding the renovation himself. He owned 20% of the deal and was footing 100% of the bills.
At refinance time he finally told his investors he had far more money in the deal than they did and asked how to get refunded. Everyone said: I thought the deal was going amazing, I always got my distribution. Most awkward conversation of his life.
What he did to solve it wasn't bad: he found other investors with more liquidity to buy the original group out and fund the rest of the project. Everyone got a return, everyone posted a profit, and he used the transaction to balance the capital account and get his money back out.
Everything in writing can be changed in writing, as long as everyone agrees to it. That's the beautiful thing about contracts, and it's something Cody and I only learned a few years in. But it was one of the most stressful things that ever happened to Caleb, and it was avoidable with a phone call.
Fund the Capital Stack or You Don't Have a Deal
Three pieces, every deal: closing, reserve, renovation.
During due diligence I walk the property with the whole team: I use a group out of Dallas for inspections and lease audits, and the contractors roll in at the same time so I can get all my renovation quotes. We estimate at the start and confirm during due diligence.
For reserves, I want a few months of full operating expenses (everything, mortgage included) so we can survive 60 days if every unit emptied. On the 144-unit we're buying at 98% occupied, and the math is: if all 144 residents left, which is statistically almost impossible, we still have enough in the account to survive two to three months.
For renovation on a stabilized property, my base number is $5,000 per unit every three years. I started doing it because LIHTC and affordable properties in Texas get 50% off property taxes if you do, and then realized it's simply a great number. It covers the ACs that fail, a healthy share of unit turns, dishwashers, a roof that springs a leak. Most unit turns run $3,000 to $5,000 even in Washington; a heavy one can be tens of thousands, but on a decent building you're not turning every unit every year.
Then you add large capex projects on top. On the 144-unit we're restoring a 4,200 square foot commercial space that flooded years ago: they pulled the drywall and just left it. That gets its own allocation, and all of it goes into the capital raise.
Do not close the deal without all three.
My base thesis is simple: if you buy income and you don't lose that income (you hold the building indefinitely) you've given yourself a raise for life. I don't want to jeopardize that. Once you get down to it, real estate is sticks, bricks and money. You're buying a small business.
If you run out of money, you kill the cash flow. All of it goes back into the building, and you're stuck in the death cycle: money comes in, money goes to the building, next month something else fails, and you live in never-cash-flow land, which you may or may not survive.
If you don't have all three pieces, you don't have a deal yet. Go back to the drawing board. Borrow less money, find cheaper money, lower the price, change the interest rate. There are lots of ways to manage it.
One Spreadsheet, Every Monday
What I want at the top of the chart is one spreadsheet: delinquency, occupancy, money made this month, turns and make-readies, and expected spend.
I look at it every Monday at 9:00 a.m. Central with my wife and my entire team. Awesome, awesome, awesome: why are there 20 people delinquent? That makes no sense. And then we spend the rest of the day researching what's off in that one part of the business.
The last time we ran that play, the answer was the government shutdown. A big share of residents in that part of the portfolio were 55-plus on fixed incomes, a lot of them retired vets, and their money wasn't coming. You're not going to evict your vets because the government shut down. So we said: you're still responsible for having money to pay rent, late fees stay in place, but we're doing no evictions: take the time you need or set up a payment plan.
Identified instantly, solved the same week.
I've audited other people's portfolios where they're maintaining 20 to 30% delinquency and don't even know it. "Oh yeah, we're 95% occupied." Do you want to know your effective occupancy? It's 60%. You're not making any money. "Huh: I wondered why the accounts are always so low."
If you're bad at accounting, add accounting to your team.
What Caleb's Other Company Taught Me About Org Charts
Caleb and I ran a sales and marketing company for a while: his company, with a tiny sliver of equity for me to help consult and get it started.
Structurally he had setters, closers, HR, hiring, payroll, and a very tech-heavy operation needing constant automation and integration. Multiple setters, multiple closers, one HR person, one main tech person with a support person, and someone else on payroll.
His complaint: every time I pay attention to one thing, everything else goes off. He'd focus on one client and they'd make an incredible amount of money (great to watch) and every other client would do less.
Look at who each role reported to. HR: Caleb. Setters: Caleb. Closers: Caleb. Payroll: Caleb. Tech: Caleb. The business had employees and every single role was still owned by one person.
It took about an hour sitting down with him and my marketing buddy Dylan, mapping the business on an actual spreadsheet, to see it. You can't run a seven-figure business with "you, you, you, you" trying to be good at all of it simultaneously. Someone needs to own hiring so you can focus on what you do best.
Caleb's best things in the world are client acquisition and software. So we put him on expansion and gave him the tech team, and put person one, person two and person three over the rest. Now not everything flows to Caleb, but the information does, on a simple spreadsheet, so he always knows where people are in his business.
Caleb makes a lot of money now, in that company and in real estate. He lives in a very cool tower in downtown Dallas and has never had a job in his life, never went to college. He got there because he finally figured out the org chart: you put the people on the bus, then you get them in the right seats.
Key Takeaways
- The engine for $10,000 a month is genuinely simple and mostly you. The engine for $42,000 a month is a different business entirely. Decide the number first.
- Every position on the chart needs one name, and no position gets two names. One person can hold many roles; two people can't hold one.
- At the starting level this is about 30 minutes a day of owner calls, 30 minutes of broker outreach, a week a year of capital raising, and part-time management.
- Run a salary cap like a baseball team. If someone's an Ohtani, pay the luxury tax in cash or equity.
- Fund every deal in three pieces (closing, reserve, and renovation) with two to three months of full expenses in reserve and $5,000 per unit every three years for renovation on stabilized property. Without all three, you don't have a deal.
- Bring investors into the problem, not just the outcome. Nobody sues a partner they've been solving it with.
- One spreadsheet, reviewed weekly: delinquency, occupancy, income, turns, expected spend.
Drawing your org chart takes maybe three hours. Call it a full day. That's one-third of one percent of your year spent deciding what engine will power your goal, and it's the only method I know that gets you from $10,000 to $20,000 to $30,000 to $50,000 a month. It's what saved Robin Hood, and it's what buys back any time freedom I have.
The last thing worth saying: the best and most stable investors Cody and I have ever interviewed (and I interview people every week on the Owner Meeting podcast) built their business, hit their goal, and then paid off their debt. One of our first mentors ever, Gary in Moses Lake, has something like $100,000 a month of cash flow. I asked how he got there. He said he put everything in 30-year fixed rate debt and never got around to refinancing, so eventually it was all paid off.
Don't rip all the money out of your business. You don't have to scale to infinity. I wanted $15,000 a month, then I had to get to $42,000, so we built the engine for $42,000. Now that we're there, I want to stabilize and pay down debt. We'll take on debt for new acquisitions, and we won't re-lever otherwise except to buy out partners or end a partnership. Less debt, more kids.
Watch the full session for the whiteboard version, and watch Cody's episode alongside it: the two go hand in hand. My mentorship is linked in the description, there's a free course on getting started in multifamily, and our free Skool community includes the calculator we use on every deal.
Read the episode transcript
0:00 When you are starting and your goal is $10,000, you need to build your business to build $10,000 a month. That is the 0:06 business that you have to build. And there's a way to map this. That is super simple. If you have $100,000 a month 0:12 that you're trying to create, it's a completely different business with a completely different org chart. So, what 0:17 you have to do is you have to map out the goals, which Cody just presented. And for you guys watching on YouTube, 0:23 first of all, make it to the event next time. Second of all, watch Cody's episode. I'll post that as well. These 0:28 two are actually going to go together hand in hand fantastically. So you set your goals, you know where 0:34 your targets are. Then you need to map out, okay, what roles and people do I actually need in the universe to create 0:39 this business. Now $10,000 a month, very, very simple to do it yourself. So I'll map out what that engine looks like 0:46 and how you can get your time back. Who here in the audience is doing real estate because they want time freedom? 0:52 Like eventually the goal is time freedom. That's okay, that's most of us. Obviously, financial freedom, being able 0:58 to do vacations, retiring a spouse, there's a lot of different reasons to want to get into real estate, but ultimately a lot of us want to make work 1:05 optional, or you just want to have control over your time. So, having a single person org is really hard if you 1:12 want ultimate time freedom. The correct scale of your business is going to be completely dependent on you. Cody talked 1:18 about upscaling, downscaling. One of my personal reasons for scaling up is because I had an obligation with the 1:25 Robin Hood I needed to figure out. That was a million dollars. I had two years to do it. So, the engine that I had to build didn't look like the engine I was 1:32 trying to build at first. Get to 50 to 100 rentals. Get to $10,000 a month cash flow. It became, huh, wait, I need to be 1:39 making about $42,000 a month. I'm not currently making $42,000 a month. We 1:44 have a different engine that we have to build. So, I have two pages left because Cody has used up the rest of my pages of 1:50 math, which I appreciate. That was an awesome segment. Thank you for doing that. So, I'm going to in two pages or less show you exactly what the org chart 1:57 looks like. Mapping. This is how I made every single company, multif family strategy. It's how we built the PM 2:02 company. The first one that I sold, the second one that I have, uh we have a sales and marketing company that I also 2:08 traded my way out of. And I have a ton of real estate. Some of these we're just 2:13 about to close on 144 unit. has its own org chart with its own on-site staff. 2:18 The last business we had to do this for was called the Robin Hood Village Resort. You're sitting inside it. This has five staff in the winter, up to 10 2:25 staff in the summer. All of these need to have a mapping for how you manage your time, especially if you end up in a 2:31 position where you have a few different businesses. We have PM supporting the rentals. We have you have to do 2:37 accounting, you have to do HR, you there's so many roles at some point, you can't have all of the financial freedom 2:44 and all of the time freedom unless you map out who are your key people. If your goals are just you just owning your real 2:50 estate, always doing it. Matt Hawkins, one of my favorite mentors, lumberjack landlord on YouTube, that's exactly what 2:57 he did. He said, "Hey, no people, no partners. This is what I'm going to do." You can build that business. It will 3:03 have certain limits. It can only make so much and for many people way more than you need. Way more. Matt is worth more 3:09 than me, Cody, and probably most of us in this room combined. You can do this as a solo op. I'm going to show you what 3:15 that looks like and then what the engine looks like if you choose to scale your business to time freedom. So, at the top 3:20 of your org chart almost every time, if you are the one in charge and driving the ship, you 3:26 My handwriting is worse than Cody's, by the way, so buckle in. You are at the top of the ORG chart. You know, you you 3:31 know your capabilities. You know your goals. I always put in the corner what my actual objective is. So, I'm going to 3:37 start with we're making $10,000. Again, YouTube, I have two pages to work this in for. So, zoom in on your cameras if 3:43 you're watching on your phone. You have you have a goal. I am trying to get to $10,000 per month. What do I need to do 3:49 this in real estate? Well, I'm going to need to start stacking cash flow. And if I'm finding my deals are adding $1,000 3:55 here, $2,000 a month here, I'm probably going to need to do five, six, seven transactions over the next few years. So 4:01 as I'm doing this, what do I actually need to do functionally? And so I break it into categories. We have deal 4:07 finding. Okay, how are we finding deals primarily? For me, it's been heavily 4:14 direct to owner, build relationships in markets. I should probably do that one myself. So I know no matter how I scale 4:21 my business, that's always going to be highly dependent on me. And then we have broker relationships. The people who 4:27 professionally are out there finding and negotiating deals. How do I move to the top of their list and work exclusively 4:32 with them? So, this will divide into two categories. Call that broker relationship and owners. Now, once we 4:40 acquire said properties, we have to do management. This could be third party. This could be you. I opted to do some of 4:46 this myself because we got absolutely robbed by my first property manager. And I've had this happen to me multiple 4:52 times. I like the control. It's a crappy business to be in. It is low margin. If 4:57 you do a great job for your clients, you increase the value of their property, they sell it, and you get fired. If you 5:03 do a terrible job, you definitely get fired. If you do a mediocre job, then like, who wants to have a mediocre 5:08 business? So, PM is a hard job. It can be fun if you own a lot of the rentals. So, I do third-party management for 5:15 people around me. And it's about 50/50 between my rentals and other people's rentals. That way, I can be excellent 5:20 for everyone, but I don't depend on my clients to make that business work. But management going to be part of your 5:26 business. Management, who's going to be running that team? Then we have capital. Now, if you want 5:32 to get to $10,000 a month, these don't take that much time. I spend for this 5:39 goal finding deals. I need to book a call with an owner. 5:45 Roughly, I'm making one or two calls a day on average. I'm making like 10 calls a week. and someone maybe two or three 5:52 someone's will actually pick up the phone and going through this conversation at least one of them is going to book a coffee meeting with me 5:57 which means on average once a week I'm meeting with some owner in a market where I want to buy a property and if 6:03 it's out of state I'm just booking a phone call I'm not having the full phone call on a cold call they're not ready 6:08 for it I am calling to schedule either a call or a coffee meeting or in Texas a 6:13 barbecue meeting it depends on where you're at so for me I'm like okay two phone calls 6:19 We're talking like 30 minutes maximum per day at time. Usually for me it's like 10. 6:25 Very little time in deal finding. Calling brokers. One of the easiest things in the world to do. We talk about it all the time on my YouTube channel 6:31 all the time on multi family strategy. Talking to brokers is a very simple process. It's kind of like ordering a 6:36 drink at Starbucks. They literally are there waiting for someone to call on the deal to talk about the deal. So when you 6:42 reach out to them, your only mission is to come off as a ready, able, and willing buyer. When you start, none of 6:48 this takes much time. These are listed online and they're just deals. The price that's online doesn't mean anything. All 6:55 you know when you see a building online, you know what the building looks like. You know what they claim the numbers are 7:00 if they decided to share any on their listing and you know that it is a seller willing to sell. Multi family brokers 7:06 are okay. So, uh, used to work for Loopnet. Loopnet. And even better, Crexy. C R I E C R E X I. I can only 7:15 write with my hand. This hand knows how to spell. My mouth is not. It's funny. If I wrote it, I can spell it. So, you 7:20 hop on loop net. You hop on correct. See, whoever lists the properties that look like what you want to buy. So, I'm actually shopping the image, not the 7:27 numbers. I'm like, that would be cool. That would be cool. That looks horrible. That building is 380 class A units. I'm 7:33 going to assume I don't qualify to buy that yet. You can really quickly figure out that's what I want to buy. Whoever 7:39 is listing the properties that I want to buy, that's the broker that I want to have the relationship with because this isn't going to be their only deal most 7:45 likely. And those firms tend to represent that. So, the beautiful thing with brokers is that they market 7:50 themselves. You can do this. This cost you 30 minutes raising capital. You do this after you find a deal. I need those 7:58 relationships. A lot of these people are those owners that you met with, people who already own in that market who have 8:04 already made money in real estate. One thing you find is the people who tend to own a lot of the buildings in your 8:09 market have a lot of money because they bought a lot of buildings in your market and they've owned for a while. They're 8:15 comfortable with your market. A lot of my capital partners are owners already in the markets that I'm operating in. 8:21 Very, very, very common. I'm also going to build other relationships. I'll go to meetups. I'll do all sorts of stuff. 8:27 Raising capital is easy if you have a deal. We talk about this all the time. I won't use all my whiteboard space for 8:33 it, but it's deal debt equity. You find the deal, you manufacture the deal. Like 8:38 Cody's math section, you choose the most appropriate debt product. I view it, you 8:43 know, the little drop down arrow when you're looking at options on a computer. You click it. What's available for this deal? Sometimes it's seller finance, 8:50 sometimes it's private capital, sometimes it's an equity partner, sometime you can go through the whole list. Bank debt, direct to Fanny, bridge 8:58 loans, it goes on and on. You choose the best debt product and then after you have a full package, you're going to 9:05 someone for the last 10% of the deal, the last 20% of the deal. Hey, we have this opportunity. This is how much money 9:11 it's going to make. Capital is not complicated. It's almost impossible without this piece. Now, once you close 9:16 your deal, you need to have some idea how you're going to manage it. This involves 9:21 maintenance. Yeah, whatever. Too many, too many letters. Maintenance and construction. We have to do our capital 9:27 improvements. We have to have an idea of what we're doing. Otherwise, our building's going to fall apart and then we're going to lose all of our money. 9:32 Management, we have to have rent collection and we'll call it tenant communications. Someone needs to interface with your tenants. They need 9:38 to be answering the phone, coordinating the contractors. If you want to get to $10,000 a month, $120,000 a year. 9:45 Capital raise. This is going to take you a few days of time on a deal that you've packaged. The capital raise, total time 9:52 commitment, low and it doesn't come up all the time. management. You can make 9:57 the option at the 10K level whether you want to self-manage, which I recommend if it's your first few deals and they're 10:03 in your market. If it's out of state, immediately add someone to your team who can get boots on ground at your 10:08 property. I don't like the idea of managing out of state without a manager. But you have a decision to make on who 10:14 you slot here. What you have to do, this is just called creating your org chart. For every business, you need to know, 10:20 okay, two gets to 10K a month. I need to buy a few properties, probably two, three, four year at most. If I want to 10:27 do this in the next two to three years, this is a pretty easy math. So, you've 10:33 mapped out what you want to do. You understand what a deal looks like, which is what Cody just showed us. This is the 10:38 engine I'm going to chuck into this machine. Where I see people go wrong is they try to go like, "Okay, well, I'm 10:44 going to need to get an acquisitions manager. I'm going to go I've seen this happen. They go they lease an expensive 10:49 office. They get five staff members in there. They get dialers on the phone. The first mentor Cody and I had who was 10:56 the perfect mentor on how not to buy real estate. Worst worst investor I've ever met. He had this vision and he 11:02 matched his vision. Just a completely imaginary. He had no number up here. He just went, "We need dialers. We need 10 11:08 dialers just calling for deals. I'm going to hire a bunch of random brokers with limited experience. I'll train them 11:14 myself. They're going to handle all of these deals." And guess what happened? His business didn't work at all. He wanted to put a I don't know cars 11:21 unfortunately. A big engine. He wanted to put whatever engine you put in a Bugatti in a Camryized business and it 11:28 blew his car apart which I imagine would happen if you did that. I don't know. I don't know mechanics. But I I just 11:34 imagine you can't do that. There's probably a reason that they build them the way that they do. You want to make sure that you build a 11:40 business that makes sense for you. This will not cost you a lot of time to do yourself. for $10,000. 11:46 That's a few 12plexes that have gone well, maybe a 25 unit building. You can do this in less than 100 units. You're 11:53 not handling too much. Management is up to you. This will lower your margin if you offload it. You'll get a little less 12:00 experience, but you can absolutely you have to buy one or two more deals to offset your cost of management. This is 12:06 the engine that you put in your machine for 10K a month. We're doing 12:11 two calls. That's a two. I promise. That's a two. Capital is going to take 12:17 you per transaction. This is going to take you like a week or so out of a year 12:24 to do three or four deals. Like you're talking low low time commitment. Capital. You're 12:30 putting together a presentation. You're raising capital. Management for a midsize portfolio. Very 12:36 part-time job. You're doing a little bit of work every week. You're going to get, if you're self-managing, you're going to get some calls. You're going to get some 12:43 obligations. Once you pass 30 units, you're going to put it in professional management. Either way, this is the 12:48 entire engine that you need to put in this little system. It's not actually that hard to build. The most important thing though, and this is when you 12:55 scale, why this is so important to understand. Caleb just grasped this in his business and was like, it all took 13:02 off. You have to assign someone to each of these roles. And what gets timeconuming and gets impossible is you 13:09 scale to a bigger number than this. And here's every role needs to have someone assigned to it. So if your assignment is 13:14 you, I'm just going to abbreviate it. You you you 13:21 can't build a huge business. If you're trying to get to 10K a month, awesome. Do it. If you want to get to 15K a 13:26 month, you can do this. Matt Hawkins, he's probably at 25, 30K a month. He's busy and he's hired someone underneath 13:33 him. So he has him, his wife, and a private property manager that just works for their family. his org chart has 13:40 started to expand. He also has a boatload of cash flow. If 13:45 you want to build a little bigger business, you have to start filling these out. So, here's what a little example of what my engine is starting to 13:52 look like as we have individual properties that need their own staff. Up top, I have me who I'll call you. 14:02 In this management 147 smaller properties, this is just for Stevenville, Texas. I have 186 units 14:09 there. I have a few smaller properties. I have a 76 unit. I have 144. This requires 14:16 one on-site. This will require two on-sites. For this much real estate, we need some maintenance to keep expanding 14:23 in the market. I still need acquisition capital. These are the basic. I need to 14:28 have deal flow. I need to have money to keep acquiring deals and expanding. I need to figure out maintenance. I need 14:34 to have on-site leasing for each property because I now have so many tenants calling in with so many 14:40 projects. As this starts to scale, I cannot possibly pick up the phone for this all day. We did in this building, 14:47 we did six evictions right off the bat. So, we're processing evictions. All of those need unit turns. To do the scale 14:55 of that, we need to have a maintenance crew and they need to have I believe we have three individuals there who all 15:01 have different roles at our main company. And then on top of that, you need your networks of plumbers, 15:06 electricians, and so you have a business like this. This is for one town. This is for Stevenville. In the next 15:13 next week, I closed on 144 units in Abalene, Texas. In February, we closed 15:18 on the 81 next door to that, bringing us at 225 units in Abalene, Texas, which means we had to build the same engine 15:25 all over again, but even bigger, because it looks like we're doing another 80 unit after that. Be a 300 unit market. I 15:33 cannot do this and then have Abene and then have Waco and then have Washington 15:38 and then have the Robin Hood and have everything be you, you you you you. I have seen a ton of people try to do that 15:45 model. That's where some of my friends have gotten stuck and their goal is something crazy. Now, as we mentioned at 15:51 the very beginning of this, I had some partners to buy out on the Robin Hood. And so because we structured the first deal wrong, 15:57 my goal went from, hey, I want to get to 10, 15K a month to, okay, how would I 16:03 scale my business in a way where I don't have to sell off any of my properties or lose ground 16:09 and still survive and correctly manage the Robin Hood with the capital that it needs and to buy out my partners. I need 16:15 to figure out a million dollars in two years, which is why this 42,000. It's rounded slightly up, but that is 16:21 essentially what you need to do to hit a million dollars a year or not a year, a million dollars in two years. So, that 16:28 being my goal, I've set aside a few different engines and then we just allocate. Now, here's the rules of the 16:34 game. When you have all these roles, you are trying to get the right people on the bus and then you're trying to get 16:39 the right people in the right seats. Sometimes you hire the right people, but they're failing in a role. You try moving them somewhere else and they 16:45 thrive. Sometimes you keep moving around, they're just not a fit. You kindly excuse them from the bus. Cody 16:51 and I had a partner and uh Moses Lake. We drove in and we are going to visit a 16:57 broker and he's not a very talented broker unfortunately. And when we introduced them or we were 17:03 about to introduce them like, "Hey, just so you know, this guy's kind of our like he's kind of the C team." And he immediately just went, "I don't know if 17:09 we need to do this meeting then. I played select soccer. I I only play A." And I was like, while that seems a little bit mean sometimes, it's true. 17:15 You can't have an A team with a bunch of C players. It's impossible. You're trying to figure out with the salary cap 17:20 that I have, how do I recruit the best possible team? And so we'll go through 17:26 and we'll do the math. How much payroll does this all cost? And I'll actually put my payroll over here. And I'll map 17:33 out, okay, to build this team. What do I have in expendable income from the 17:38 profit of this engine? From the 186 units that I have here, I have 150, I 17:45 think it was 145. I have 145k in salary cap to spend to fill these roles. This 17:53 is your entire map. That is my goal per month, but I'm not there yet. Well, I wasn't. 17:59 Here's my individual market. I have a business that has this much to spend on the best players that can possibly 18:05 recruit. You can also give equity in the deals if you run out of salary caps. So, 18:10 you can give up some to get some. Since I can't have me me me 18:18 led by Corey, she takes up 50K of salary cap and has a 18:23 small equity stake in my PM company. So, she has she's underpaid, but she's given a portion of the company that's rapidly 18:28 growing. Good deal for her. here the on-site here. I also have a 44 18:35 unit that needs a little bit of uh attention here uh here and there. But for this engine that we're building 18:40 here, this is the Abene deal. I realized Stevenville, we'll do this here. We'll just call this the 44 unit and the 18:46 smaller now we're perfectly mapped for what Stevenville is on site. Hannah was a property manager who has a company in 18:52 Stevenville that does fantastic in single family. She's lived in Stevenville her whole life. She's connected with every nonprofit and we 19:00 always have problems with the stupid fire marshal who I don't like and don't agree with. 19:05 He only likes working with people from Stevenville. It's a small town and he wants to work with all of his buddies. 19:10 However, the assistant fire marshal is married to Hannah. Putting Hannah on her team makes a lot of sense. Hannah does 19:18 uh part-time outer 44 unit and part-time outer 76 unit. So, the rules of the game here are you 19:24 need to slot names on everything. Every position needs a name. No positions can have two names. So every position in 19:30 your company needs to flow in the right direction. Any person can be slotted in as many 19:36 roles as you can handle. Can't put two per people on the same role. That's the only rule for filling out an org chart. 19:43 Smaller properties, this is handled. This is done zone. This is done. Hannah will do this but 19:51 reports to Corey and Corey assist. This is a good model for the management side acquisition. We have a lot of deal flow 19:58 in this market. I am currently sitting at the head position of Robin Hood 20:04 property management, the acquisition company, multif family strategy. I'm working as many hours as one can humanly 20:10 work and still kind of sleep occasionally. So for Christian, I love negotiating deals. However, 20:17 we have someone on the team who's even better at doing this. the guy who only wants to do networking, Caleb Hmel, one 20:23 of my first mentees. He has a little over 200 rentals today. Our flow here, 20:29 Caleb owns the broker relationships that we mentioned. He owns uh the owner 20:34 relationships. We tag team. He actually introduces me to a lot of people. Whenever he has a meeting, he's like, "Hey, we're meeting someone. This guy's 20:40 worth meeting." I drive out and meet. I do the same thing. I network. I bring Caleb along. We operate as one unit. But 20:47 overall the beginning of of acquisition, Caleb within there, close, negotiate, 20:55 all of the sales that go in here, Caleb will present five or six deals to me that he has underwritten saying, "Hey, 21:00 we have relationships here, here, here, and here. We have opportunities here, here, and here, and here. I want to pursue one of these two. Now, I will 21:06 come in, choose one, and we'll start the capital raising process. We'll go under contract." This saved me a ton of time. 21:13 In the beginning, our 10K goal, Cody and I both were doing the job. We were 21:18 calling owners. We were negotiating deals. We were getting things under contract. We specialized a bit, but it was just 21:25 the two of us tag teaming. One of us could do the other's job, the other could do the other's job. We were interchangeable parts. In this, Caleb 21:31 has defined roles. He's like, "I will maintain these broker relationships. I'll go to the broker lunches while 21:37 you're coaching multif family strategy." When Christian's at the property putting out a fire, literally putting out a 21:42 fire. We had we had one at the 76 a garage uh burned down. I drive out and 21:47 handle the fire, Caleb is back in office making sure that everything is running smoothly and that all the deals are 21:53 progressing. You add to this legal legal and lending all of these pieces of acquisition. Caleb takes the top end of 21:59 the funnel for I take the bottom. He talks to our lenders. He negotiates with our lenders. He presents loan packages 22:04 to me. I then pick up the rest of it, file the paperwork, get us to the finish line. This smooth handoff process is a 22:11 twoperson process. Compensation for Caleb. He gets a whopping zero dollars. But we 22:18 share every deal that we do together 50/50. Caleb is a straightup partner. He gets equity, which cost me none of my 22:24 salary cap. So we have Hannah at right now she's at 45. Okay. We have Cory. We 22:31 have 95k of our salary cap spent of a budget of 45 maintenance. You can bring 22:37 this in house for me. I don't want to do that. I have too many companies. I have 22:42 great contractors. We work on these relationships. So, I can put this in its own little outsource box. It cost me 22:49 money that I could have spent on salary to just make sure this is always coordinated. What I did is said, "Hey, 22:56 the rest of my salary cap here about $50,000. That's what we're going to basically be 23:01 tossing to three different groups for all the project coordination." Now, of course, your actual renovation budgets 23:08 are their budgets. But I took the rest of my salary cap and said, "Hey, this works. We're way within budget. For 23:14 maintenance, we have a group called N2 in Stevenville. We have a couple of other fantastic contractors. We have a 23:20 solo guy named Daniel Seals, who's our handyman. We chose to do maintenance where they play zone instead of 23:25 man-to-man. Instead of having on-site maintenance for every property, I have multiple teams that all know my 23:31 properties that all rove between properties. We need something quick, Daniel Seals drives out. We need 23:36 something big, N2 drives out. There's always someone working on the portfolio at all times, but they're manning 23:43 Stevenville as opposed to my property to property or 23:48 who oversees the maintenance people though. I wish I had the time. Danny, my 23:53 lovely wife, who I retired from teaching. I got stuck with that job. We're going to work on retiring her from her new job very soon. So, we're our 24:00 goal, personal goal for me is we want to we have kid number one. My my little kids Andre just turned one. Would like 24:06 to continue to grow the family. So, her new goal cuz she actually loves this job. She's amazing at renovation, 24:12 design, and coordinating the contractors. And she's meaner than I am, which means the contractors actually get 24:17 stuff done on time. Danny's goal is to retire from this. So, we know that we need to open up salary cap for someone to oversee this. Danny comes in as an 24:24 equity holder in the entire portfolio and the PM company alongside me. What I 24:29 want to show here though is the difference between 42 month and 10K a month is wildly different. You can solo 24:37 the 10K a month. You have to figure out Corey, Hannah, Caleb, Danny, and all the 24:45 associated contractors. And you have to have the software to track it. Then you have investor relations which is just 24:51 me. So I guess we'll add that as one more piece to our org. IR. We know with 24:57 Caleb from working with him for a while, Caleb is the best worker of all time and he is the one of the most effective 25:03 people as long as you give him one primary task. If you give him two tasks, 25:09 he tries to do both at 100%. If you've ever tried to split yourself at 200%, it does not work well. Caleb needs to 25:15 charge at one thing. So, we keep Caleb on the lending, the brokers, the legal, but the it's all front end. It's all 25:21 relations. So, Caleb's job, outreach, connections. He has the sweetest job. 25:26 His job is basically take people out to lunch all the time, all day long. However, I don't have time to do that. 25:33 That is the most costly thing to me time-wise. Caleb runs the fun part, 25:38 spends all of his hours on the fun part, and allows everyone else to do everything that they do. When we get to 25:44 the investor relations, I'm typically the one who's maintaining everything with all of my investors, making sure we 25:51 have communication flow so that people aren't just sitting there left in the dark, which is the worst thing you can 25:56 do, period, in your portfolio is make everyone a bunch of money and don't let them know that you're making money along 26:02 the way. Cuz if you hit any snag in this process, who hears a real estate transaction not go exactly as planned? 26:09 You guys are standing in my one that went least to plan. And by standing, I mean sitting. This was so stressful. If 26:15 we had not communicated with the partners how things were going, can you imagine how the call would go near the 26:20 end? Hey guys, so surprise, it's been a couple years. Yeah, we didn't make as 26:26 much money as we thought. Like that's how you get yourself sued. People get mad. People get upset if you have a 26:32 problem in here and you're doing good in investor relations. So this is my main role 26:38 or can be yours for investor relations. This is the part where I'm like, "Hey, does everyone know what's happening? When there's a problem, am I allowing my 26:45 partners to weigh in?" Example, Matt and I have a project in Afraida. It's 26:50 actually the rena is going fantastic. The building is beautiful. Leasing is going okay, but we have a little bit of 26:58 a dispute with how our PM's managing it and the timelines on the project. It's not going poorly at all. It's leasing 27:03 up. It's making money, but it is a little bit behind schedule. If I just 27:08 announce to Matt in front of everyone right now, "Hey, surprise, Matt. We're making money, but not yet," that could 27:14 be a little bit shocking. But what we do is him and our other partner, we get together and we actually talk about the 27:19 deal. We talk about ideas on how to fix it. And we can build our own orb chart for the problems. So, we have another 27:26 investor on it. We'll call him Steven because I don't know if he wants to be named. His name's not Steven. But he'll 27:32 go through, we're leasing our retail spaces. He's like, "I'll reach out to the Chamber of Commerces. let me own the retail space. Now, they're part of the 27:40 solution. I have yet to see almost anyone get sued on a deal where you brought in everyone as part of the 27:46 solution. Everyone's aware of the problems and everyone's working on it. It's when you try to fix it all yourself 27:52 that you have the problems. Caleb's first ever deal, he did what Cody and I did. Amazing. Your first mentee does 27:58 exactly the same mistake as you. Caleb came in and he found 28:04 okay so if I raise exactly enough to close the deal but I have a reno project if someone moves out I now lack the cash 28:10 flow to continue my reno project he had a awesome deal fantastic debt shark it 28:16 be like nine out of 10 for if I was just ranking that deal a nearperfect deal 28:22 because he didn't raise enough and he didn't have the right investors what he did instead of call everyone is he just 28:28 kept writing checks and just funding all the rena. He owned 20% of the deal. He 28:34 was footing 100% of the bills. When it came time to refinance, he then 28:39 let his investors know, hey guys, by the way, I have a ton more money in this deal than you guys. How do I get 28:46 refunded? And everyone was like, I thought the deal was going amazing. I always got my distribution. It was the 28:51 most awkward conversation. What he ended up having to do, which wasn't too bad, he found other investors who had a whole 28:57 bunch more money to buy them out, fund the rest of his project. Everyone got a return, and Caleb used that to balance 29:03 the capital account. So, he got his money out, their money out. They actually all posted a profit, and he 29:08 brought in other people to finish his epic deal, who had the liquidity. You can fix anything that you do in writing 29:14 as long as everyone agrees to it. It's the beautiful thing about contracts. Cody and I learned that a few years in is everything in writing can be changed 29:21 in writing. There's a lot of flexibility, but that was one of the most stressful things that ever happened 29:26 to him. I remember he would call me just in an absolute panic cuz he's like, "We didn't talk. I want to own this piece of 29:33 my business." You might find you have an engineering background. You might actually be amazing at 29:39 maintenance. You might even start a maintenance business that plugs into your company where you make a lot of money on this side while getting to this 29:45 goal. This could be you. This could be someone else. You're not a social person. You're or you're just an 29:52 analytical person. Sometimes those people can't present to investors at all. It's just not your strength. Fill 29:58 in your strengths. Make sure you have the best people on your team for this. You can plug this engine into a 200 unit 30:04 market or a 300 unit market. It's a simple engine. And I know it looks like it's really complicated because I ran 30:09 out of pages so we had to keep this condensed. You can plug this engine. 30:15 I have my salary cap. I look at it like a baseball team. You have a salary cap and if you have someone who's like really good, you can pay the luxury tax. 30:22 You can give them a little extra equity or you can maybe reduce your profitability a little bit to bring on 30:27 the the A+. I don't know baseball, but there's the whoever the guy is on the Dodgers who's like the best of all time. 30:32 Someone, what's his name? Otani. Thank you. Thank you. 30:37 You can pay a little extra if you find an Otani. If you have like a greatest of all time, I'm probably going to give 30:43 Hannah a pretty substantial raise at some point and she's pretty much an invaluable player for Stevenville. I'll 30:48 sacrifice some profitability to keep an A team. But this is all you're doing. You're mapping out your baseball team. 30:54 How do I get the right players in the right position within salary cap to win my World Series, which is right here. 31:02 I've expended my baseball knowledge. There's four bases. Okay, now we've done all the baseball knowledge. I have 31:08 formula used for your salary cap. Uh salary cap. Uh so I have found in PM. So this is what I use. It may or may not 31:14 be applicable to you, but when I do my deals, I negotiate the management 31:20 contract because I have property management into the investment opportunity. So I'll say, hey, I'm going 31:26 to manage, for example, the 144 I'm doing. It is 3% plus salaries. My 31:32 salaries for the 144 is $120,000 a year for up to three employees. When we 31:38 acquire the 81 unit, that is going to add $50,000 to the salary cap for my 31:44 on-site person and is built into the actual investment. So, my profit in that is nominal because 31:52 we have fixed cost overhead software. the 3% less all of my variable cost for 32:00 running the PM in that market is my profit. So I'm making like a point on management on a lot of my deals, but the 32:07 on-site employees are direct pass through from the LLC. So in this I have the 76 unit has enough of a salary cap 32:17 built into the deal to support this individual. The 45 is really goes to Corey who oversees multiple regions. So 32:24 you would take this and zoom it out one more where you have Abene, you have 32:30 Stephvenville, you have Waco, you have Washington. Corey would sit right above all those 32:37 and her salary is dictated by a portion of all of those that comes out of that nominal 3%. She's absorbed through all 32:44 of that. Yes. Yes. Yes. 3% goes into overhead and again that that pays for the management 32:51 and the software. And again, I have run at about a 1% margin on what we bring 32:57 in. It's not a lot of money. 1% of the gross rents of everything we manage is about 33:03 what we profit. Uh but because I run a little skinnier, I'm able to provide all the services of like we can provide 33:08 direct on-site. And as a bonus, if you were going to run your building with on-site management, 33:15 you don't have to worry about payroll, you don't have to worry about taxes, filing W2s, you just pass straight 33:20 through to us. So, when you look at the full property management package, I'm like, "We're going to do your staffing. 33:26 We're going to do your rent collections. Uh, we could, my company does asset management as well. So, we can do your 33:32 distributions to owners, your accounting, your bookkeeping, all of that rolls into 3% plus whatever the on-site salary is. And if you're a 33:39 smaller building like a 25lex, we'll probably be about, depending on the market, like a 6% management fee. That's 33:44 just a flat easy way to run it uh that we've been able to do for an extended period of 33:49 time. So, if it needs an on-site salary cap exists, which is why for me to open a new market, I need to have at least 33:57 one building that is large enough to have on-site managers because that's how I personally open up my salary cap wise. 34:04 I have to get a network of people all paying 6 to 8% to be able to fund all the overhead. This model has been a lot 34:11 easier for me to manage where I can put key personnel that are paid for by the buildings, but they specifically serve 34:18 that building and have the advantage of your tenants can walk into the office and sign a lease. It's beautiful thing. 34:25 But this is how I built this to scale. Yeah. So really that goes under our capital 34:30 stack. Wow. It's like we planned this. Look at the one that doesn't have anything underneath it. Okay. Capital stack. So we need to make sure that our 34:37 deals are fully funded for three pieces. closing reserve Renault. Thank you. The one that 34:43 you just asked about. So, when I'm doing my due diligence, we walk with uh the entire team. So, I I use a a group 34:48 that's based out of Dallas that does all of my inspections and lease audits. They'll roll in with the contractors. 34:56 Same time, I'll get all of my quotes for all of the rena that I want to do. So, we have an estimate when we start and we confirm this during our due diligence. 35:03 So, rena is going to have dollars. Closing is going to have the cost. It's going to have reserve. I like to have it 35:09 at a bigger building there's a certain point where just you have enough money in the account but I usually like to do a few months full operating expenses 35:17 mortgaging like all expenses we can survive for 60 days if everyone moved out. So, in the 144 I'm buying, we're 35:24 buying at 98% occupied. Our math is, hey, if every if all 144 people moved 35:30 out, which it would statistically almost impossible if they all left, we still have enough money in the account to 35:36 survive for 2 3 months. That's our reserve. Renault budget is fixed on that one, which we did at uh that particular 35:43 one because they're all in good condition. $5,000 per unit every 3 years. The only reason I do that is 35:49 because if you do a litec property or affordable in Texas, that happens to be 35:54 where you get 50% off property taxes if you do that. So, I was like, I started doing that because we have to. And then 36:00 I realized that's actually a great number for a stabilized property. $5,000 36:05 per unit renovation every 3 years. That keeps your properties pretty nice. Covers any ACs that goes out, does some 36:12 unit turns. That's been a really healthy base renovation budget. And then we add in whatever we have for large capex 36:19 projects. These are Texas prices and yeah in Washington prices then yeah just just add a couple million uh per per 36:26 every 3 years I do about 5,000 per door is is been a really reasonable full 36:31 remodel budget for me. So so if I'm coming in taking over a building for the first time that covers a lot of failed 36:37 ACs that covers a lot of unit turns. A lot of our unit turns even in Washington state they're three to 36:44 $5,000. there's a heavy one can obviously cost tens of thousands of dollars. But on a decent building, 36:50 you're usually not turning every unit every year, but you will have stuff that fail. You have dishwashers that go out. 36:56 You have roofs that spring a leak. There's enough that comes up in 3 years. On a good condition, just base scenario 37:04 that works really well for us. And then I add any major projects such as I'm opening on the 144. were opening a 4,200 37:11 square foot commercial space that had flooded years ago and they just kind of left it. They took out the drywall, but 37:18 they just kind of left it. We're going to restore that space. That obviously has its own allocation, but that all 37:24 goes into your capital raise. Do not close the deal without all of these. And this one managed by Big C. Caleb's 37:30 little C. I'm kidding. Yeah. If your if your name does not start with a C, probably can't partner. I apolog I'm 37:37 kidding. No, I do I do a lot of the capital allocations. Caleb will actually run these numbers with me. We both run 37:43 all of our numbers, but when we go through, I'm making sure when we raise, we are very very very confident. We can 37:49 close with enough money to get through the project. Again, my base thesis, if you buy income and you don't lose that 37:56 income, so you hold the building indefinitely, you've given yourself a raise for life. I do not want to jeopardize that. It is hard enough to do 38:03 this. It's not that hard. Like once you get down to it, it's sticks, bricks, and money. Like that's it's just real estate 38:10 that makes money. You're buying a small business. When you're running through this, if you run out of money, you kill the cash 38:16 flow. All the cash flow goes back in the building. You're stuck in this death cycle of I get money in, I spend it on 38:22 the building, now the money's gone. Next month, something else fails, and you just get stuck in never cash flow land, 38:29 which you may or may not survive. just buy deals that have enough income, have these reserves, and if you don't have 38:34 this, you don't have a deal yet. And you just go back to the drawing board and you go, "Okay, well, what do we have to do for this? We need to borrow less 38:41 money, cheaper money, lower the price, change the interest rate." There's lots of different ways to manage this, but 38:48 we're just making sure we have all these in check. And you have to make sure that you have someone who's on top of making sure the darn money comes in. That's 38:54 pretty much your business model. Talk words. Wow. Long day at the Robin Hood. 39:00 If you take this and insert this directly into the business, it matches this. It falls within this. You know 39:06 your pieces. Sitting down and drawing the dark or chart. While it's not the most interesting thing you can do in the 39:11 world, this takes you maybe 39:17 3 hours. Imagine it took you a full day. You have 365 of these. So, we're saying 39:22 uh onethird of 1% of your year was spent on actually deciding what engine you 39:28 want to power your goal. This is one of the most basic things you can do. Every time we found a problem in our business, 39:34 Caleb and I ran a uh sales and marketing company for a while and I helped him start it. So, it's Caleb's company and I 39:39 had a little bit of like tiny sliver of equity to help consult and help him get started. Here's the problem with his 39:45 business model. Caleb had setters is for online offers. He had a bunch of really 39:50 cool has a bunch of really cool clients including Christians, closers. He has 39:56 hiring. So, he has an HR. He has payroll which I guess kind of goes under HR but the way he ran it felt like two 40:01 different two different departments setters closures payroll and you have tech very techheavy company so he needed 40:09 a lot of automations a lot of software always integrating everything probably could have used any of you programmers 40:15 in here cuz I know we have a whole bunch of them this is Caleb's business now there's multiple setters there's 40:21 multiple closers one HR person one main tech person with 40:26 a support person and then payroll is someone else. When Caleb was like, "Dude, every time I pay attention to one 40:32 thing, it goes off." He has one client that he focuses on, they made an incredible amount of money. It was really cool to watch the stats, but then 40:39 all of the other clients would do less. And Caleb's like, "Okay, well, I have all these people working for me. Why is 40:45 the system not working?" If you look to who they report to, HR managed by Caleb, setters managed by Caleb, closes managed 40:51 by Caleb, payroll managed by Caleb, tech managed by Caleb. The whole building was the whole business, even though it had 40:56 employees, every single role was owned by Caleb. It took about an hour of 41:02 sitting with him and one of my marketing buddies, Dylan. We sat down and we mapped out his business on an actual 41:08 spreadsheet and we said, "Here's your problem. This cannot be your business for a big business. Caleb's running a 41:13 sevenfigure business. You can't run a million dollar a year run rate with you, you you you 41:20 trying to figure out all these people and be good at the same time. There is a point where you look at your pieces and 41:25 you go, "Okay, someone needs to own the hiring for me so that I can focus my attention on the things that I do best." 41:31 Caleb's best thing in the world, client acquisition, and he's really good at the software. In Caleb's business, if he 41:38 goes, "Okay, I'm going to go onboard clients." So, we'll call that another one, expansion. If the business is now 41:44 Caleb's on expansion and Caleb's really good with the tech. So Caleb 41:51 owns the tech team. Now he can put person one here, person two here, person 41:57 three here, and this can end up being person one as well. Now you have a threeperson team. You've followed the 42:03 rules. Not everything flows to Caleb, but the information flows to him on a simple spreadsheet. Now he knows where 42:09 people are in his business. What the And that's what you want in this in here's what I want to know at the top of 42:16 at the top of this. This is what I want to know. I want one spreadsheet that says this is your delinquency. This is your occupancy. This is how much money 42:21 you made this month. Here are our turns and make readies and here's what we expect to have to spend this month. I 42:28 can look at that every single week, which I do on Monday at 9:00 a.m. Central time with my wife and my entire 42:33 team. And we can look through and go, "Awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome. Why are there 20 people delinquent? This 42:38 makes no sense." And guess what? We researched the rest of the day. What's off in that one part of the business? 42:44 And then we find, turns out, our last one was the government shutdown. Turns out a ton of our tenants in that 42:51 particular part of our portfolio were 55 plus on a fixed income and a lot of them were retired vets. Their money wasn't 42:58 being set. Well, okay. Now, we've identified a problem instantly in our business. 43:03 You're not going to evict all your vets because the government shut down. We just came in and said, "Hey, you are 43:09 actually responsible to have money to pay your rent." Like, the fact that you're on fixed income, you should still 43:14 have money set aside. Late fees are still in place, but we're not doing any evictions on a you have as much time as 43:20 you need or payment plans to figure this out. Just there should be a little late fee tacked on solutions like that. I've 43:27 seen people maintain delinquencies and they don't even know 20 30% delinquent 43:32 tenants and I'll come in as a property management. I audit their business and I'm like, they're like, "Oh, yeah, we're 43:38 95% occupied." I'm like, "Do you want to know your effective occupancy?" It's 60%. You're not making any money. Oh, I 43:45 wondered why the accounts are always so low. It's like, if you suck at accounting, you add 43:50 accounting to your team. I have found what this has allowed me to do, and this is why I'm sharing this this problem. 43:57 Caleb's company is really good. Caleb actually makes a lot of money now. Uh, and he makes a lot of money in real estate. Caleb lives in this really cool 44:04 tower in downtown Dallas and he's never had a job in his life. Didn't go to 44:09 college. He got to do that because he figured out the freaking org chart. He finally figured out the piece like, "Oh, 44:14 wait. You put the people on the bus. You get the people in the right seats." This is the only way that I have seen. And I 44:20 know it's messy, but building how much do I have to spend? How much am I trying 44:25 to profit? What do I need to do to get there? If you build this team and you spend a day on just kind of noodling 44:32 through what are all the pieces and who does it, you can start building this team, it's the only way I know to get 44:39 from 10 to 20, 20 to 30, 30 to 50,000 a month. This saved the Robin Hood. It 44:45 also allows me some amount of time freedom to run the companies that I run and you get to scale. So the big choice 44:51 for everyone here, the decision everyone has to make, and this is really the the end takeaway here, what do you want that 44:56 top number to be? What are you actually trying to build? And you get there. And then once you hit it, you get to set a new goal. And it can be more money. It 45:02 could be more time. It could be another vacation with your family. My personal goal, D and I want to expand our family. 45:08 I haven't had time freedom because I chose the Robin Hood project. We chose the adventure and we're paying for the 45:13 adventure. Now that I've bought the partners out, I get to structure a lot of my business around how do I get a 45:19 little bit of time back and where do I want to invest that time? I get to pour back into multif family strategy, which is my number one passion project. And we 45:27 get to make this place absolutely awesome. Outside of that, more kiddos are awesome. That's that's what 45:33 Christian wants to do. Less debt, more kids. That is how you build this. You put an engine in it. You know where 45:38 you're headed. And then you do what Cody did. And I know he's Oh, there he go. He's right over there. I thought he was helping us cook. Even better, Cody. The 45:45 thing that Cody's doing, which I think is the responsible thing. You hit your goal. And when enough stuff is enough, you start paying down the debt like 45:51 crazy. And now you have less obligations, more stability. the best investors that Cody and I ever 45:56 interviewed. And I interview people on my channel every single week on the Owner Meeting podcast, the best, most 46:03 stable people built their business, they hit their goals, and then they paid off their debt. One of our first mentors 46:10 ever, Gary Man in Moses Lake, this guy has like a $100,000 a month cash flow. 46:15 He has all of these rentals. I'm like, "How did you get there?" He's like, "Well, I put them all in 30-year fixed rate debt. I never got around to 46:21 refinancing, so then they were all paid off." What a great Don't rip all the money out of your business. You don't 46:27 have to scale to infinity. Know where you're going. For me, I wanted to get to 15. I then had to get to 42. So, we 46:33 built an engine to get to 42. Now that we're sitting there, I want to focus on stabilizing the 46:40 business, paying down debt. I want to go full Gary Man. I don't need to have a whole bunch of debt in real estate. 46:45 We'll take on debt to do new acquisitions. We won't relever other than refinancing to buy out partners or 46:51 to end a partnership. That's the whole model.
Put these ideas to work.
Get support from Christian and the coaching team with your next multifamily deal. See how the mentorship works or start your application.
Apply Now


